 |
A recent California Court of Appeal decision, Sully-Miller Contracting
Co. v. California OSHA Bd. (2006) 138 Cal. App. 4th 684, held that
an asphalt paving company was liable for a safety violation even
though its employee was leased to another company. Sully-Miller,
an asphalt paving company, leased one of its employees, Jeff Moreno,
to Manhole Adjusting, Inc., as an asphalt roller operator. While
working at Manhole’s worksite, Moreno was fatally injured
when he was thrown from the roller because it lacked a workman’s
seat belt. OSHA cited Sully-Miller for a serious violation of the
employer safety provisions of its regulations because Sully-Miller
did not have an injury prevention program that instructed Moreno
to refuse work at a secondary site until he was provided with a
working seat belt and for its failure to provide periodic monitoring
of the work site. The Court of Appeal concluded that Sully-Miller
was Moreno’s primary employer and that it was not relieved
of responsibilities to provide general safety training to its employees
just because the employee is leased to a secondary employer.
This
case should act as a reminder to all employers that they need
an up-to-date injury prevention program and include within it the
obligation of employees to refuse work where proper safety equipment
is absent.
(c) Copyright 2006 Miller, Morton, Caillat & Nevis.
All rights reserved.
The information provided here is intended to educate the reader
regarding issues of contemporary business interest. It is not intended
to constitute legal advice or recommendations for application to
any specific legal dispute. You should always confer with your
legal counsel about the application of the principals and issues
discussed to your own circumstances.
|
 |